<?xml version="1.0"?> 
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>CMG Forum</title>
    <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/</link>
    <description>CMG Forum - If You Can't Measure IT, You Can't Manage IT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:48:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:48:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <managingEditor>webmaster@cmg.org</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@cmg.org</webMaster>

      <item>
        <title>Capacity Management Certification</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=51#p143</link>
        <description>Can anyone recommend a capacity management certification or training track? Does anyone have experience with the ITIL Practioner Certificate in Capacity Management offered by Metron? Thanks Nell ...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri,  5 Mar 2010 17:43:45 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=51#p143</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Re: UNIX Processor Q Length vs Processor Busy</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=20#p142</link>
        <description>Tim,   Thanks for the educational response.   It seems to me that many performance problems are sudden. A minor new software version goes live, an additional user community  comes online, a query goes nuts. So knowing the recent typical range of values for performance metrics and comparing them to current values may be more useful than carefully planned thresholds. Time series analysis might be ap ...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:40:05 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=20#p142</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Re: List of parameters?</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=24#p141</link>
        <description>Rather than a list, which is so vendor-hardware-config dependent...consider this:  computer systems have four basic resource categories of interest for your purposes - CPU-related metrics, Memory-related metrics, I/O-related metrics, and Network-related metrics. Evaluation of the capacity of these resources is generally focused on measures of utilization whereas evaluation of service is focused on ...</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:14:42 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=24#p141</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Re: Building Capacity Mgmt Software Requirements</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=34#p140</link>
        <description>These are very good responses. I would like to offer one more suggestion, and that is to consider multiple, inexpensive, and simple tools rather than one large and complex toolset.  Integrate them into your solution also as simply as possible.  Some of the larger and more comprehensive products demand a long learning period for the capacity planner because of their complexity and the tasks related ...</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:50:27 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=34#p140</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Re: Capacity Management evaluation</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=35#p139</link>
        <description>Yes, I agree with Shana. These are large and expensive tools and they don&apos;t come with fully featured trial versions that you simply download with a zip file as you would in the Windows utility world.    For these high-end products you have to start a &apos;relationship&apos; with the vendor and often they want to be closely involved in your evaluation process. This can be a good thing since they have a big  ...</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:32:36 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=35#p139</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Re: WLM Resource Capping</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=44#p138</link>
        <description>Sometimes your goals for WLM can&apos;t be achieved or are too aggressive, and in those situations, a more modest goal has a better overall effect. You can have too many high level goals for too many tasks. Make a (10% - 80% - 10%) distribution with &apos;most favored&apos;  and &apos;least favored&apos; tasks in the upper/lower 10%.  Also, with WLM, you can have too many service classes and policies for adjustments and m ...</description>
        <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:23:07 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=44#p138</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Re: UNIX Processor Q Length vs Processor Busy</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=20#p137</link>
        <description>I think your objective is not an analysis of Q length and busy, but finding patterns that predict &amp;quot;trouble&amp;quot;.   Based on the other comments, clearly, Q length and CPU Utilization in isolation or in comparison to a fixed threshold of &apos;not troubled&apos; values is not useful for your purposes. The analysis becomes one of hypothesizing multiple causal models to &apos;explain&apos; measured values rather th ...</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:38:48 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=20#p137</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Re: IBM MF MIPS offload to open environmet</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=49#p136</link>
        <description>I&apos;ve seen work go both ways, i.e. mainframe to distributed and vice versa.  The technical reasons for hosting on the mainframe are (1) Availability, (2) High relative I/O content of workloads, and (3) workloads that can exploit I/O parallelism.  These are dimensions of value, not cost, since cost per unit of work is almost always higher for mainframes. For apps heavy with Java code, etc. specialty ...</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:13:56 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=49#p136</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Kudos</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=50#p135</link>
        <description>Wanted to personally thank Margaret Greenberg and the entire Measure IT editorial staff for the Mario Morino story in this month&apos;s issue of Measure IT.  Mario was a great influence on nearly every CMG &apos;dinosaur&apos;, and it was great to see him acknowledged once again.  &lt;!-- s:D --&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_e_biggrin.gif&quot; alt=&quot;:D&quot; title=&quot;Very Happy&quot; /&gt;&lt;!-- s:D --&gt; Dr Bernie ...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:49:22 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=50#p135</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>IBM MF MIPS offload to open environmet</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=49#p134</link>
        <description>Hello, We are evaluating a process of offloading some MIPS (~3000) of CICS COBOL from Z10 to Clarity (CICS compatible) and Microfocus COBOL on HP Superdom (INTEL ITANIUM) machine.  I know that proper sizing depends very much on the specific workload.   But I wonder if there  are some numbers/benchmarks/calculation methodology  for MIPS to ITANIUM cores ratio.  Avi ...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:32:40 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=49#p134</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>SYSPLEX environment</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=48#p133</link>
        <description>In a SYSPLEX environment  what are possible causes for  high priority critical batch jobs to wait for CPU resources more than lower priority normal class jobs? ...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri,  5 Feb 2010 14:24:12 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=48#p133</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>CMG marketing, e.g. wikipedia</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=47#p132</link>
        <description>Hi, At the latest CMG meeting there was some discussion of the ways in which CMG could be brought to the attention of more people.  One avenue is the Wikipedia page at [url:34297iz6]http&amp;#58;//en&amp;#46;wikipedia&amp;#46;org/wiki/Computer_Measurement_Group[/url:34297iz6] though I noticed that it is a bit outdated (e.g. refers to &amp;quot;CMG&apos;08 will be held in Las Vegas&amp;quot;).  I would encourage anyone to  ...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu,  7 Jan 2010 10:42:59 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=47#p132</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Dutch NL CMG to start</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=46#p131</link>
        <description>Hello to all, and especially dutch speaking members.  I am happy to announce that a small team is formed to set up the dutch CMG chapter. If you speak dutch, and/or live in the netherlands, i urge you to join the discussion at [url:1ke07yt7]http&amp;#58;//cmg-nl&amp;#46;blogspot&amp;#46;com[/url:1ke07yt7] and subscribe yourself to the mailing list by sending a blank message to [url]mailto:nlcmg@getresponse.co ...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu,  7 Jan 2010 10:35:43 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=46#p131</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Re: Clustering already highly available servers</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=45#p130</link>
        <description>The basis statistics goes like this. If the failure modes are completely independent, you can multiply the probabilities for downtime.  So if one server is down 10% of the time, then the probability of two being down at the same time would be 10% times 10% = 1 %, giving an uptime of 99%.  In your case that would lead to an uptime of 99.999999 %, although it is very unlikely that the failure modes  ...</description>
        <pubDate>Thu,  7 Jan 2010 10:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=45#p130</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Clustering already highly available servers</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=45#p129</link>
        <description>Some modern UNIX servers are claimed to be four nines reliable (99.99% -IBM P series) I.e highly available. If I cluster trwo together what improvements in reliability/availability will i get? I presume I will not get mainframe levels (5 x 9&apos;s), but can&apos;t seem to find out the exact maths to use. ...</description>
        <pubDate>Tue,  5 Jan 2010 16:05:41 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=45#p129</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>WLM Resource Capping</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=44#p128</link>
        <description>In our installation, a couple of service classes were assigned to a single resource group (limit set at SU&apos;s/sec). Both the service classes were  defined with the importance of 2 and velocity goals of 50 and 20 respectively.  The high velocity service class is not meeting it&apos;s goals when the resource group gets capped.  The low velocity service class has more tasks than the high velocity service c ...</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:55:49 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=44#p128</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Re: Reporting - Should it be Easier?</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=43#p127</link>
        <description>- The messy, time-consuming part of reporting is marshalling the correct data. So anything that makes it easy to get the right data would be helpful.  - Having a customizable template with all the right context would be helpful. For example, a place for the object of the report (server name, application, transaction) , the time frame, metric selected, author, source of data, time the report was pr ...</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:29:26 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=43#p127</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Re: SSDs and the end of seek time</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=39#p126</link>
        <description>Hi Carl, I just started looking at these boards and noticed this topic.  Dr Gilbert Houtekamer (who co-wrote the MVS I/O Subsystems book with Pat) presented a paper and case study at CMG last week on SSD&apos;s.  I assume you can get the paper off of the CMG site but let me know if not and I&apos;ll send you a copy.  &lt;!-- e --&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:john.baker@intellimagic.net&quot;&gt;john.baker@intellimagic.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!--  ...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=39#p126</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Reporting - Should it be Easier?</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=43#p125</link>
        <description>Some of us have done a LOT of SAS coding, worked with a variety of products, but it still seems like it takes too long (and too much knowledge of the database) to get the information we need in the format we want.  And new people are unlikely to want to sweat thru the learning curve we have.  Some vendors do a lot of canned reports (good, if they are the right ones, but no flexibilty), others expe ...</description>
        <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:28:36 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=43#p125</guid>
      </item>
    
      <item>
        <title>Monitoring approaches</title>
        <link>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=42#p124</link>
        <description>Monitoring of computer hardware, software and applications can be provided via a single family of monitors or point products. New technologies are often monitored by point products first and so the staffs that manage those technologies may only have these point products available when needed. The point products may also provide tools with more specific in-depth capabilities. Suites of monitors fro ...</description>
        <pubDate>Mon,  7 Dec 2009 15:08:28 GMT</pubDate>
	<category>Post</category>
        <guid>http://www.cmg.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=42#p124</guid>
      </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
